Pages

Saturday, May 18, 2013

One Too Many - Die Hard Edition

There can, indeed, be too much of a good thing.  Especially when it comes to movie sequels.  The most recent example is the latest installment of the Die Hard franchise.  I think we can all agree that the original Die Hard is a classic action movie.  It changed the genre.  It gave us the intelligent villain, the everyday Joe hero, and it still holds up today.  It's quotable, it had great characters, exciting action, a cool plot twist, and proved that Bruce Willis could be a star.  We'll forgive it for doing that stupid 80's trick of having the supposedly dead bad guy suddenly come back for one last scare.  At least it paid off when Powell shot him and brought his character full-circle.
The second one, Die Harder, was kind of lame.  I mean, the title alone should have been enough of a red flag.  It took everything that was cool about the first movie and tossed it out the window.  Well, everything but Bruce Willis.  He was the only legitimately good thing about that movie.  We were expected to believe that, even in the Die Hard universe, John McClane could go just about anywhere in Dulles airport.  And that the entire airport had only one maintenance guy.  And that no one really cared about that one plane five minutes after it crashed.  It may have seemed that the second installment was one too many.
But the third movie, Die Hard with a Vengeance, made up for it.  It wasn't as great as the first movie, but it was a lot better than the second.  It brought back a lot of the elements of the first movie, particularly an elaborate heist plot.  The revenge plot against John McClane seemed like an afterthought and completely contrived with its whole cat-and-mouse game around New York, but it worked because McClane had Samuel L. Jackson as a reluctant partner.  Yeah, that's pretty much what made that movie.  Samuel L. M. F. Jackson.
When the fourth movie came out in 2007, Live Free or Die Hard, it proved that there was still life in the franchise.  It didn't shy away from the fact that John McClane was older.  Instead of having to save his estranged wife, whom we realized was useless character in the first act of the second movie, he had to save his daughter.  Not just save her, but save his relationship with her.  Justin Long wasn't half bad, either, and it kept his career alive a little longer.  The action was still Die Hard campy, but this time it was more inventive and fun.  Sure the plot was ridiculous and it had Kevin Smith in it.  But it also had Maggie Q.  Win.  Of the all the movies, this one is my second favorite.
Then this year, they went one too far.  A Good Day to Die Hard took everything that was good about the earlier movies -- even the second one -- and tossed them.  It tried way too hard to play up the estranged father and son story line between John McClane and is son, Jack.  When Jack turned out to be a CIA agent or some such BS, it was obvious they were trying to pass the mantle on to someone younger to continue the franchise.  But the plot was thinner than the hair on Bruce Willis' head.  The action was little more than car chases and fight scenes.  And talk about phoning in performances.  On second thought, let's not.  People who have wondered when Die Hard was really going to die just witnessed the flatline of the franchise.  Die Hard 5 was one too many.

Saturday, May 4, 2013

May the Fourth Be With You

So I know the new Star Wars movies are coming out in a couple of years.  I wish I could say I was more excited.  I LOVED the original Star Wars - now called Star Wars: Episode IV: A New Hope - and The Empire Strikes Back still holds up as a fantastic movie, even though it doesn't stand on its own.  Then Return of the Jedi came out in 1983.


I was 13 years old and so excited.  People cheered whenever a familiar character appeared on screen.  I enjoyed the Sarlaac pit, the Endor hover bike chase, and the big climactic battle of the Death Star that was basically a retread of the original Death Star battle, just with a bigger budget.  And of course, being 13, seeing Princess Leia in the slave girl costume ... sorry, where was I?  Oh, yeah.  So I left the theater after seeing Jedi and thought, "That was fun.  Now when does the REAL movie come out?"  It just didn't seem like a solid follow up to Empire. And I was 13!



Fast-forward some twenty-six years and the first prequel was released - The Phantom Menace.  The ads looked great.  And I was so excited to get a new Star Wars movie.  And then I saw it.  Here's how well it went over.  Remember that scene where Jar-Jar Binks gets his hand caught in the engine of Anakin's pod racer?  Everyone in the entire audience shouted, "Turn it on!  Turn it on!"



As much as Menace tried to deal with heavy themes, Lucas went too far the other way in terms of silliness or "comic relief" to balance it out.  And his writing was so stilted, particularly the dialogue.  Lawrence Kasdan's script for Empire was brilliant.  Simple, easy, fun, weighted, and balanced.  What ticked me off was how much Lucas just seemed to either forget about everything he established, or just decided to say, "Hey you know all the cool stuff?  Forget it.  I'm doing this now."  I mean, I thought the Force was something anyone could get in touch with.  It is, after all, "an energy field created by all living things.  It surrounds us and penetrates us and binds the galaxy together."  No.  You gotta have little microscopic midicholorians in your blood.  What the ... ?  Oh, and remember how Ben said that Yoda trained him?  Nope.  Who the hell is Qui-Gon?  Okay, sure Yoda may have trained Ben as a "youngling," but come on.  You're reaching.  Admit it.



The prequel sequels didn't fare much better in my mind.  Clones had its moments, but as a whole bored me to no end.  I hated Hayden Christensen almost as much as I hated Jar-Jar and the kid who played young Anakin.  In retrospect, Hayden may have been brilliant, but I haven't decided.  And I can sum up my reaction to Sith in one word ... "Nooooooooo!"



So now the new movies are coming out.  I think Disney will do a good job and I have faith in J.J. Abrams.  But knowing that Carrie Fisher and Mark Hammill are attached makes me wary.  I don't mind referencing their characters' legacies in the story, but bringing them back into it - even if only as a cameo - just seems like too much of a stunt.



I remember seeing an interview with George Lucas once.  It was just before Jedi was going to be released in theaters.  The interviewer asked him if there would be a lot more effects and eye candy or the like.  Lucas responded that there would be, but they wouldn't be the focus.  He said, "The story isn't the effects.  The story is the story."  He seems to forget his own words a lot.  I hope the new Star Wars movies are good.  But those hopes aren't high.  Maybe the writers will follow Patton Oswalt's advice ...




Monday, April 22, 2013

Someone I Love Needs A Cure

It was Easter Sunday, 2013.  My daughter had been feeling lethargic for a few weeks and complaining of a chronic sore throat and dry mouth.  She seemed okay, though.  We thought maybe it was mono or something.

That morning we hunted for Easter Eggs and she sang in church with her brother.  That afternoon, she took a long nap.  Then another one.  At dinner, she only ate a couple of bites and said she "felt weird."  Despite sleeping most of the day, she went to bed.  Around 1:30 in the morning, she came into our room and could not stop throwing up.  He moaned and wailed with terrible stomach pains.  We worried she might have eaten something that disagreed with her -- maybe some bad candy or something at breakfast.  She knew, on some subconscious level, it was something else.

At one point, she turned to me and said, "Daddy, I'm not going to die, am I?"

I replied, "Of course, you're not going to die, sweetheart."  I was very close to being very wrong.

In the morning light, we saw a girl who looked like a ghostly version of our daughter.  It was as if she lost fifty pounds overnight.  Her skin was a pale gray, her eyes and cheeks were sunken and dark, and her speech was starting to slur.  She looked like she'd been in a concentration camp.

A couple of weeks earlier, my mom had noticed that our daughter was constantly thirsty and going to the bathroom a lot.  She thought our daughter might have diabetes and we should get her tested.  We planned to take her in for testing on Monday, April 1st - the day after Easter.

When we saw how sick she looked, we knew we weren't going to get her tested.  We were taking her to the emergency room.  My wife rushed her to the hospital while I made arrangements for someone to stay with our son.  Apparently, on the ride over, my daughter started to roll her eyes into the back of her head.  She was losing consciousness.  My wife talked to her, begging her to stay awake.  They reached the hospital to find it was under renovation.  There was no obvious way in.  When my wife found a place to park, she had to carry our daughter on her back -- she didn't have the strength to walk anymore.

As soon as they made it inside, the nurse at the front desk recognized the immediacy of the situation.  The staff rushed our daughter into the ER, ran a quick test, and found that her blood sugar was at a critically high level.  She had what's called Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA).  Our doctor eventually told us if we hadn't been home, if she had been alone for another couple of hours, our daughter would have died.  She knew.  That night, she knew her body was shutting down.

Fortunately, we caught it in the nick of time.  Within an hour, the color and fullness came back to her face as she lay sleeping in the hospital bed, hooked up to an insulin drip.  Later that day, she was transferred to another hospital that had a PICU (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit) equipped to care for her properly.  She was in the hospital for three days.

In that time, we learned a LOT about Type 1 Diabetes.  We went through the initial stages of blaming ourselves.  But we knew that even had we had her tested a week earlier, it wouldn't have stopped her from getting diabetes.  It just would have saved us the frightening trip to the hospital.

We also learned just how many people we knew who had Type 1 Diabetes or were affected by diabetes.  Emotional support flowed to us in waves and I have never been so grateful for the kindness of friends, family, and strangers.  A friend of mine even wrote a "get well" song for her and several of my Disney friends performed it, recorded it, and sent me the file to show her in the hospital.  She lit up. My wife and I were overcome with tears of gratitude.

I have also never been so proud of my daughter.  She handled everything with aplomb.  She accepted her situation immediately.  Of course, there were bouts of disappointment and lamenting that it happened.  But she knew there was nothing she could do about it. This was her "new normal."  She took it on bravely and immediately.  Twenty-four hours before, she was deathly afraid of needles.  That went all went away.  Without fear or complaint, she started giving herself her own insulin shots -- and she does this four to five times a day.  She watches her carb intake, she manages her own insulin, and she even prepares a lot of her own food.  I'm not just proud of her, I have a respect for her I doubt she'll ever understand.

I am amazed at the sheer number of people who live with Type 1 Diabetes.  I don't say they suffer from it.  Because Type 1 Diabetes is a manageable condition.  People live long, full lives with it.  It doesn't define them.  It doesn't control them.  What amazes me more are the strides being made in finding a cure.  Every day, we get a little bit closer.  But because this has touched me on such a personal level, I am wholeheartedly throwing myself into the quest for a cure.  I would love for one to be found in my daughter's lifetime.  I would love for one to be found in anyone's lifetime.  It's a subtly frightening thing to be insulin dependent for the rest of your life.  No one should have that fear.  And I certainly don't want anyone to go through what we experienced with our daughter that ironic April 1st.

That is why I am donating a percentage of the profits of all my book sales to the American Diabetes Association.  So know every time you purchase one of my books, you are helping to bring a cure for diabetes that much closer to reality.

From me, for my daughter, and for everyone who lives with Type 1 Diabetes, thank you.  From the bottom of my heart - thank you.

Friday, March 22, 2013

Thing 1 and Thing 1


That’s not a typo in the title.  That’s on purpose.


The other day, I saw a family walking towards a popular theme park and the two children were both wearing “Thing 1” shirts.  Both of them.  Not “Thing 1” and “Thing 2.”  They were both wearing shirts that said “Thing 1.”  Now, this is complete speculation on my part, but I have a feeling I know why.


I’m willing to wager that neither of them wanted to be “Thing 2.”  Being “Thing 2” implies that you’re second, or not as good.  The silver medal winner.  Or, of all the losers, you’re the first one.  Of course there’s also the stigma of being “Number 2” and having it mean the poop thing.  No kid wants to be the poop thing.  But then by that rationale, they are now both the pee thing, so I’m pretty sure we can rule out “Number 2” poop reference as a reason.

That means, then, that they both wanted to be “Number 1.”  But there can’t be two number 1s.  Because then it begs the question, which one is the real number 1?  I’m betting if both of you have to be number one, then neither of you are.

I’ll even go so far as to speculate that maybe there was a conversation about the older child getting the “Thing 1” shirt and the younger child getting the “Thing 2” shirt.  It’s just chronological order.  And that’s fun, right?  But then someone threw a fit.  There are a couple of people who could have thrown said fit, and none of them would have been the oldest child.

It’s most likely that the youngest child threw a fit about being “Thing 2.”  And he probably did it for the reasons above, the poop thing being the least likely, but still a consideration.  I’d bet his brother pointed that one out.  So in an effort to prevent a public meltdown and save his precious self-esteem, the parents caved and allowed the youngest brother to get a “Thing 1” shirt also.

I’ll bet the older brother had a problem with his younger brother getting a “Thing 1” shirt, but didn’t say anything.  He just swallowed his frustration, as he had come to do in so many similar situations over the years since his brother was born.  It would fester in his guts with a quiet bitterness that he would take out on his baby brother in subtle ways in the years to come, completely undermining his younger brother’s confidence that his parents were so eager to protect.  So in letting the younger brother get a “Thing 1” shirt also, they’ve effectively ruined both kids.

It also could be the parents who threw the fit.  Maybe it wasn’t an actual fit, per se, but they could very well have just insisted that both kids have a “Thing 1” shirt so neither of them would feel “second best.”  Again, that will only damage the kid on a psychological level so deep, you’ll never see it manifest until years later and in ways that you would never associate with this particular shirt purchase.

Another thing that really gets me about this is the fact that there was even a debate about the shirt at all.  It’s fun if you have two kids and one is “Thing 1” and “Thing 2.”  Then they get to be the characters from The Cat in the Hat.  Not like there’s any real distinction between the two Things, but still, it gives them more of a sense of identity.  Making them both “Thing 1” completely strips them of their individuality.

Then there’s the fact that the Things in the Dr. Seuss book are troublemakers.  Sure, it’s fun to pretend that your bundles of joy are little troublemakers.  The fact that you even put them in the shirts suggests that they are probably good kids.  Real troublemakers wouldn’t wear cutesy shirts like these.  They’d have skulls on them and logos for death metal bands or pro-wrestlers without a sense of irony.  So now, parents, you are basically saying that not only do your kids have no individuality, they are troublemakers and you can’t decide which one is the “number one” troublemaker.  Put those together and you will likely get real troublemakers down the road.

So, good job parents.  In your attempt to be “fair” and “save their self esteem,” you have done neither.  Your kids are not going to learn that they don’t always get to be “number one.”  They’re not going to have a sense of individuality.  They’re going to grow up thinking that if they complain enough, they’ll get their way.  The world doesn’t work like that.  Although sadly, it’s starting to.  And I blame parents like these.

Of course, the store could have just been out of “Thing 2” shirts.  But I can’t imagine there being a big run on those.  Still, I could be wrong.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Friends With Benefits

Somebody once asked me if I had any friends with benefits.  I said, "I have lots of friends with benefits.  They all have good jobs that give them medical, dental, and vision insurance coverage."  Then they said that's not what they meant.  Apparently, I had completely misunderstood the whole meaning of the phrase "friends with benefits."  So I knew what I had to do.  I had to start sleeping with all of them.  That wasn't as great as I thought it would be.  A very small number of them were even hot.  And then with so many, it was hard to coordinate schedules.  Then there was my friend Gary.  He's, like, 67.  That was so not a turn on for me.  I was so happy when he retired.  But then he started collecting social security and I was like, "Dammit!"  So I just told him we couldn't be friends anymore.

Monday, February 4, 2013

We Have A Winner!

And we have a winner!  I asked everyone to send in a picture of themselves reading their copy of "Apparition."  The photo contest winner would receive a free copy of the entire trilogy when it is released later this year.  And the winner is ... Meribeth Freeman of Thousand Oaks, California!

Congratulations, Maribeth!  Of all the photos submitted, yours was ... the only one.  Sigh.  But, hey, it made choosing a winner really easy, so thanks!  When the trilogy is ready to be released, you will receive free copies of all three books.

Monday, January 21, 2013

I Have A Dream

I think Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have A Dream" speech is one of the most inspirational, celebrational, muppetational speeches of all time.  It speaks to a Universal truth about all men (and women, calm down) being created equal and a world where people are "not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."  It's a noble aspiration.  And one I wholeheartedly agree with.  Still, there is a fundamental problem to this speech -- it's title.  It is commonly known as the "I Have A Dream" speech.  When, really, I think it should be known as the "I Have A Really Great Idea" speech.  Because, let's face it, no one dreams like this.

Based on the title of the speech, I would think it would be more likely, to go like this ...  "I have a dream ... that I am being chased by a giant spider and I can't get away because the tires on my Big Wheel won't move.  I have a dream ... that I'm falling from the sky and Lena Horne won't give me the frying pans.  I have a dream ... that I'm the same age I am now but for some reason I'm back in school and there's a test I didn't know about and I'm sitting at my desk in my underwear and everyone is staring at me because the phone that I have instead of a right hand won't stop ringing.  I have a dream ... that I really have to pee and there's no place to go so I try going in my clothes hamper but I still really have to pee.  I have a dream ... that I'm driving in a car from the back seat with my feet and it's out of control and I'm headed right towards a rock wall and just before I crash ... I wake up!  And that's when I have this really great idea -- that we  all should live in a world where people are not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

When I got out of bed to write this idea down, my bedroom floor turned to water and I fell in and found myself being chased by sharks with Mila Kunis heads.  So maybe it really is a dream after all.  Shame.

Why is my laundry wet?